Assessment of portable chlorophyll meters for measuring crop leaf chlorophyll concentration
Assessment of portable chlorophyll meters for measuring crop leaf chlorophyll concentration
Simple item page
Full item details
- creativework.keywords - en
- leaf chlorophyll concentration
- portable chlorphyll meter
- sensitivity analysis
- remote sensing
- radiative transfer model
- creativework.keywords - fr
- concentration de chlorphylle dans les feuilles
- compteur de chlorophylle portable
- analyse de sensibilité
- télédetection
- modèle de transfer radiatif
- dc.contributor.author
- Dong, Taifeng
- Shang, Jiali
- Chen, Jing M.
- Liu, Jiangui
- Qian, Budong
- Ma, Baoluo
- Morrison, Malcolm J.
- Zhang, Chao
- Liu, Yupeng
- Shi, Yichao
- Pan, Hui
- Zhou, Guisheng
- dc.date.accessioned
- 2023-04-18T14:42:08Z
- dc.date.available
- 2023-04-18T14:42:08Z
- dc.date.issued
- 2019-11-19
- dc.description - en
- N/A
- dc.description.abstract - en
- Accurate measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration (LChl) in the field using a portable chlorophyll meter (PCM) is crucial to support methodology development for mapping the spatiotemporal variability of crop nitrogen status using remote sensing. Several PCMs have been developed to measure LChl instantaneously and non-destructively in the field, however, their readings are relative quantities that need to be converted into actual LChl values using conversion functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between actual LChl and PCM readings obtained by three PCMs: SPAD-502, CCM-200, and Dualex-4. Field experiments were conducted in 2016 on four crops: corn (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and canola (Brassica napus L.), at the Central Experimental Farm of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. To evaluate the impact of other factors (leaf internal structure, leaf pigments other than chlorophyll, and the heterogeneity of LChl distribution) on the conversion function, a global sensitivity analysis was conducted using the PROSPECT-D model to simulate PCM readings under different conditions. Results showed that Dualex-4 had a better performance for actual LChl measurement than SPAD-502 and CCM-200, using a general conversion function for all four crops tested. For SPAD-502 and CCM-200, the error in the readings increases with increasing LChl. The sensitivity analysis reveals that deviations from the calibration functions are more induced by non-uniform LChl distribution than leaf architectures. The readings of Dualex-4 can have a better ability to restrict these influences than those of the other two PCMs.
- dc.identifier.citation
- Dong, T., Shang, J., Chen, J. M., Liu, J., Qian, B., Ma, B., Morrison, M. J., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Shi, Y., Pan, H., & Zhou, G. (2019). Assessment of Portable Chlorophyll Meters for Measuring Crop Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration. Remote Sensing, 11(22), 2706. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11222706
- dc.identifier.doi
- https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11222706
- dc.identifier.issn
- 2072-4292
- dc.identifier.uri
- https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/209
- dc.language.iso
- en
- dc.publisher
- MDPI
- dc.rights.openaccesslevel - en
- Gold
- dc.rights.openaccesslevel - fr
- Or
- dc.subject - en
- Agriculture
- dc.subject - fr
- Agriculture
- dc.subject.en - en
- Agriculture
- dc.subject.fr - fr
- Agriculture
- dc.title - en
- Assessment of portable chlorophyll meters for measuring crop leaf chlorophyll concentration
- dc.title.fosrctranslation - fr
- Assessment of portable chlorophyll meters for measuring crop leaf chlorophyll concentration
- dc.type - en
- Article
- dc.type - fr
- Article
- local.article.journalissue
- 22
- local.article.journaltitle
- Remote Sensing
- local.article.journalvolume
- 11
- local.article.pagination
- 2706
- local.peerreview - en
- Yes
- local.peerreview - fr
- Oui
Download(s)
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Name: AssessmentPortableChlorophyllMeters_2019.pdf
Size: 2.19 MB
Format: PDF
Collection(s)