Continuous light does not compromise growth and yield in mini-cucumber greenhouse production with supplemental LED light

Simple item page

Simple item page

Full item details

creativework.keywords - en
photoperiod
light-emitting diode
greenhouse gardening
photosynthesis
cucumber
yield
continuous lighting
economical analysis
creativework.keywords - fr
photopériode
diode électroluminescente
concombre
culture en serre
photosynthèse
rendement
analyses économiques
éclairage permanent
dc.contributor.author
Lanoue, Jason
Zheng, Jingming
Little, Celeste
Grodzinski, Bernard
Hao, Xiuming
dc.date.accessioned
2023-04-21T15:26:40Z
dc.date.available
2023-04-21T15:26:40Z
dc.date.issued
2021-02-17
dc.description.abstract - en
Continuous lighting (CL, 24 h) can reduce the light intensity/light capital costs used to achieve the desired amount of light for year-round greenhouse vegetable production in comparison to short photoperiods of lighting. However, growth under CL has led to leaf injury characterized by chlorosis unless a thermoperiod or alternating light spectrum during CL is used. To date, there is no literature relating to how cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) respond to CL with LEDs in a full production cycle. Here, we evaluated a mini-cucumber cv. “Bonwell” grown under 4 supplemental lighting strategies: Treatment 1 (T1, the control) was 16 h of combined red light and blue light followed by 8 h of darkness. Treatment 2 (T2) had continuous (24 h) red light and blue light. Treatment 3 (T3) was 16 h of red light followed by 8 h of blue light. Treatment 4 (T4) was 12 h of red light followed by 12 h of blue light. All treatments had a supplemental daily light integral (DLI) of ~10 mol m−2 d−1. Plants from all treatments showed similar growth characteristics throughout the production cycle. However, plants grown under all three CL treatments had higher chlorophyll concentrations from leaves at the top of the canopy when compared to T1. The overall photosynthetic capacity, light use efficiency, and photosynthetic parameters related to light response curves (i.e., dark respiration, light compensation point, quantum yield, and photosynthetic maximum), as well as the quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII; Fv/Fm) were similar among the treatments. Plants grown under all CL treatments produced a similar yield compared to the control treatment (T1). These results indicate that mini-cucumber cv. “Bonwell” is tolerant to CL, and CL is a viable and economical lighting strategy for mini-cucumber production.
dc.identifier.citation
Lanoue, J., Zheng, J., Little, C., Grodzinski, B., & Hao, X. (2021). Continuous light does not compromise growth and yield in mini-cucumber greenhouse production with supplemental LED light. Plants, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020378
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020378
dc.identifier.issn
2223-7747
dc.identifier.uri
https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/240
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
MDPI
dc.rights.openaccesslevel - en
Gold
dc.rights.openaccesslevel - fr
Or
dc.subject - en
Agriculture
dc.subject - fr
Agriculture
dc.subject.en - en
Agriculture
dc.subject.fr - fr
Agriculture
dc.title - en
Continuous light does not compromise growth and yield in mini-cucumber greenhouse production with supplemental LED light
dc.title.fosrctranslation - fr
Continuous light does not compromise growth and yield in mini-cucumber greenhouse production with supplemental LED light
dc.type - en
Article
dc.type - fr
Article
local.article.journalissue
2
local.article.journaltitle
Plants
local.article.journalvolume
10
local.peerreview - en
Yes
local.peerreview - fr
Oui
Download(s)

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Thumbnail image

Name: ContinuousLightDoesNotCompromiseGrowthAndYieldInMiniCucumberGreenhouseProduction_2021.pdf

Size: 2.43 MB

Format: PDF

Download file

Page details

Date modified: