Canola productivity and carbon footprint under different cropping systems in eastern Canada
Canola productivity and carbon footprint under different cropping systems in eastern Canada
Simple item page
Full item details
- dc.contributor.author
- Ma, Bao‑Luo
- Liang, Chang
- Herath, Aruna
- Caldwell, C. D.
- Smith, Donald L.
- dc.date.accepted
- 2023-06-14
- dc.date.accessioned
- 2024-05-08T19:58:24Z
- dc.date.available
- 2024-05-08T19:58:24Z
- dc.date.issued
- 2023-06-28
- dc.date.submitted
- 2022-05-19
- dc.description.abstract - en
- Diversified crop rotation with an appropriate sequence may be a promising strategy for increasing crop productivity while reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and lowering carbon (C) footprint for more sustainable agricultural systems. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the agronomic performance and C footprint of canola (Brassica napus L.) production in different cropping systems, and (ii) better understand how canola could be adapted to existing cropping systems in eastern Canada. A four-year canola-based phase rotation study, including maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.), started in 2011 and continued for two cycles in Ottawa, ON; Montreal, QC; and Canning, NS. It was found that, compared to continuous monoculture (canola, maize or wheat), diversified cropping systems increased crop yields by an average of 32% and reduced the C footprint of all rotations by 33%, except under severe heat and drought conditions. The effect of rotation on yield and C footprint of canola production varied significantly among site-years. At Ottawa, the canola following soybean (SC) had 12% higher canola yield than monoculture canola (CC), 5 and 8% higher canola yield than canola following wheat (WC) or maize (MC). At Montreal, canola yield ranked as MC > SC > WC > CC. At Canning, the highest canola yield was in WC (21%) and SC (13%). Overall, most SC rotations had the lowest C footprint, and CC cropping had the highest C footprint, with only a few exceptions. Regardless of the cropping system, canola required more N input and was high in oil and protein in the harvested product, and produced the highest C footprint, while soybean had the lowest C footprint at all three sites. Our findings indicate that a diversified cropping system with canola production following soybean significantly improved canola yield while lowering the C footprint. However, profitable and sustainable canola production in eastern Canada is threatened by climate change-induced drought and heat stress.
- dc.identifier.doi
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10294-w
- dc.identifier.issn
- 1573-0867
- 1385-1314
- dc.identifier.uri
- https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/2464
- dc.language.iso
- en
- dc.publisher
- Springer Nature
- dc.rights - en
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
- dc.rights - fr
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
- dc.rights.openaccesslevel - en
- Gold
- dc.rights.openaccesslevel - fr
- Or
- dc.rights.uri - en
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- dc.rights.uri - fr
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fr
- dc.subject - en
- Processes
- Agriculture
- dc.subject - fr
- Liens et fonctions
- Agriculture
- dc.subject.en - en
- Processes
- Agriculture
- dc.subject.fr - fr
- Liens et fonctions
- Agriculture
- dc.title - en
- Canola productivity and carbon footprint under different cropping systems in eastern Canada
- dc.type - en
- Article
- dc.type - fr
- Article
- local.article.journaltitle
- Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
- local.article.journalvolume
- 127
- local.pagination
- 191–207
- local.peerreview - en
- Yes
- local.peerreview - fr
- Oui
- local.requestdoi
- No
Download(s)
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Name: CanolaProductivityCarbonFootprintUnderDifferentCroppingSystemsEasternCanada.pdf
Size: 656.36 KB
Format: PDF
Collection(s)