Evaluation of a commercial culture-free neutralization antibody detection kit for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 and comparison with an antireceptor-binding domain enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Simple item page

Simple item page

Full item details

dc.contributor.author
Papenburg, Jesse
Cheng, Matthew P.
Corsini, Rachel
Caya, Chelsea
Mendoza, Emelissa
Manguiat, Kathy
Lindsay, L. Robbin
Wood, Heidi
Drebot, Michael A.
Dibernardo, Antonia
Zaharatos, Gerasimos
Bazin, Reneé
Gasser, Romain
Benlarbi, Mehdi
Gendron-Lepage, Gabrielle
Beaudoin-Bussières, Guillaume
Prévost, Jérémie
Finzi, Andrés
Ndao, Momar
Yansouni, Cedric P.
dc.date.accessioned
2025-02-06T20:00:34Z
dc.date.available
2025-02-06T20:00:34Z
dc.date.issued
2021-04-30
dc.description.abstract - en
<p>Background<br> Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surrogate neutralization assays that obviate the need for viral culture offer substantial advantages regarding throughput and cost. The cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit (GenScript) is the first such commercially available assay that detects antibodies that block receptor-binding domain (RBD)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-2 interaction. We aimed to evaluate cPass to inform its use and assess its added value compared with anti-RBD enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).</p> <p>Methods<br> Serum reference panels comprising 205 specimens were used to compare cPass to plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and a pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization (PLV) assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies. We assessed the correlation of cPass with an ELISA detecting anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, and IgA antibodies at a single timepoint and across intervals from onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p> <p>Results<br> Compared with PRNT-50, cPass sensitivity ranged from 77% to 100% and specificity was 95% to 100%. Sensitivity was also high compared with the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 85–97), but specificity was lower (58%; 95% CI, 48–67). Highest agreement between cPass and ELISA was for anti-RBD IgG (r = 0.823). Against the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay, anti-RBD IgG sensitivity (99%; 95% CI, 94–100) was very similar to that of cPass, but overall specificity was lower (37%; 95% CI, 28–47). Against PRNT-50, results of cPass and anti-RBD IgG were nearly identical.</p> <p>Conclusions<br> The added value of cPass compared with an IgG anti-RBD ELISA was modest.</p>
dc.description.sponsorship
C. P. Y. and J. Pa. hold a “Chercheur-boursier clinicien” career award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé. This work was partially funded by le Ministère de l’Économie et de l’Innovation du Québec (Program de soutien aux organismes de recherche et d’innovation), the Fondation du CHUM, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (via the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force) (to A. F.). A. F. is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry (RCHS0235 950-232424). G. B.-B., and J. Pr. are supported by CIHR fellowships. R. G. is supported by a MITACS Accélération postdoctoral fellowship. cPass kits were provided in kind by GenScript.
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab220
dc.identifier.issn
2328-8957
dc.identifier.pubmedID
34136587
dc.identifier.uri
https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/3402
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher - en
Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America
dc.rights - en
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights - fr
Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri - en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.uri - fr
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subject - en
Health
Coronavirus diseases
dc.subject - fr
Santé
Maladie à coronavirus
dc.subject.en - en
Health
Coronavirus diseases
dc.subject.fr - fr
Santé
Maladie à coronavirus
dc.title - en
Evaluation of a commercial culture-free neutralization antibody detection kit for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 and comparison with an antireceptor-binding domain enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
dc.type - en
Article
dc.type - fr
Article
local.article.journalissue
6
local.article.journaltitle - en
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
local.article.journalvolume
8
local.pagination
1-10
local.peerreview - en
Yes
local.peerreview - fr
Oui
Download(s)

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Thumbnail image

Name: papenburg-commercial-culture-free-neutralization-antibody-detection-kit-sars-cov-2-comparison.pdf

Size: 463.28 KB

Format: PDF

Download file

Page details

Date modified: