Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose

Simple item page

Simple item page

Full item details

creativework.keywords - en
COVID-19 / epidemiology
COVID-19 / immunology actions Search in PubMed Search in MeSH Add to Search
COVID-19 / prevention & control*
COVID-19 Vaccines / administration & dosage*
COVID-19 Vaccines / supply & distribution
Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
Humans
Immunization Schedule
Immunization, Secondary
Models, Statistical
Mortality
SARS-CoV-2 / immunology*
United States / epidemiology
Vaccination / methods*
Vaccination / statistics & numerical data
dc.contributor.author
Moghadas, Seyed M.
Vilches, Thomas N.
Zhang, Kevin
Nourbakhsh, Shokoofeh
Sah, Pratha
Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
Galvani, Alison P.
dc.date.accessioned
2024-03-22T19:00:31Z
dc.date.available
2024-03-22T19:00:31Z
dc.date.issued
2021-04-21
dc.description - en
Two of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines currently approved in the United States require 2 doses, administered 3 to 4 weeks apart. Constraints in vaccine supply and distribution capacity, together with a deadly wave of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 and the emergence of highly contagious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, sparked a policy debate on whether to vaccinate more individuals with the first dose of available vaccines and delay the second dose or to continue with the recommended 2-dose series as tested in clinical trials. We developed an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission to compare the impact of these 2 vaccination strategies. Our results show that for Moderna vaccines, a delay of at least 9 weeks could avert at least an additional 17.3 infections, 0.69 hospitalizations, and 0.34 deaths per 10,000 population compared to the recommended 4-week interval. Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines also averted an additional 0.60 hospitalizations and 0.32 deaths per 10,000 population in a 9-week delayed second dose. However, there was no clear advantage of delaying the second dose with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines in reducing infections, unless the efficacy of the first dose did not wane over time.
dc.description.abstract - en
Two of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines currently approved in the United States require 2 doses, administered 3 to 4 weeks apart. Constraints in vaccine supply and distribution capacity, together with a deadly wave of COVID-19 from November 2020 to January 2021 and the emergence of highly contagious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, sparked a policy debate on whether to vaccinate more individuals with the first dose of available vaccines and delay the second dose or to continue with the recommended 2-dose series as tested in clinical trials. We developed an agent-based model of COVID-19 transmission to compare the impact of these 2 vaccination strategies, while varying the temporal waning of vaccine efficacy following the first dose and the level of preexisting immunity in the population. Our results show that for Moderna vaccines, a delay of at least 9 weeks could maximize vaccination program effectiveness and avert at least an additional 17.3 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 7.8–29.7) infections, 0.69 (95% CrI: 0.52–0.97) hospitalizations, and 0.34 (95% CrI: 0.25–0.44) deaths per 10,000 population compared to the recommended 4-week interval between the 2 doses. Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines also averted an additional 0.60 (95% CrI: 0.37–0.89) hospitalizations and 0.32 (95% CrI: 0.23–0.45) deaths per 10,000 population in a 9-week delayed second dose (DSD) strategy compared to the 3-week recommended schedule between doses. However, there was no clear advantage of delaying the second dose with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines in reducing infections, unless the efficacy of the first dose did not wane over time. Our findings underscore the importance of quantifying the characteristics and durability of vaccine-induced protection after the first dose in order to determine the optimal time interval between the 2 doses.
dc.identifier.citation
Moghadas SM, Vilches TN, Zhang K, Nourbakhsh S, Sah P, Fitzpatrick MC, et al. (2021) Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose. PLoS Biol 19(4): e3001211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211
dc.identifier.pubmedID
33882066
dc.identifier.uri
https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/2189
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
PLOS Biology
dc.rights - en
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights - fr
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.openaccesslevel - en
Gold
dc.rights.openaccesslevel - fr
Or
dc.rights.uri - en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.uri - fr
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subject - en
Health
dc.subject - fr
Santé
dc.subject.en - en
Health
dc.subject.fr - fr
Santé
dc.title - en
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose
dc.type - en
Article
dc.type - fr
Article
local.acceptedmanuscript.articlenum
e3001211
local.article.journalissue
7
local.article.journaltitle
PLOS Biology
local.article.journalvolume
19
local.peerreview - en
Yes
local.peerreview - fr
Oui
Download(s)

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Thumbnail image

Name: moghadas-evaluation-covid-19-vaccination-strategies-delayed-second-dose.pdf

Size: 1.72 MB

Format: PDF

Download file

Page details

Date modified: