Assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of methane regulations in British Columbia, Canada

Thumbnail image

Download files

Language of the publication
English
Date
2023-06-29
Type
Accepted manuscript
Author(s)
  • Johnson, Marie France
  • Lavoie, Martin
  • MacKay, Katlyn
  • Long, Mallory
  • Risk, David
Publisher
Taylor & Francis

Abstract

Many jurisdictions are introducing methane reduction policy as part of climate commitments, with a focus on the oil and gas supply chain. Periodic comprehensive leak detection and repair (LDAR) surveys or screening leak detection and repair surveys are required in the British Columbia, Canada oil and gas sector to reduce unintentional methane emissions caused by leaking infrastructure. By finding and fixing leaks quickly, emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, are reduced. In this study, we explored how effectively British Columbia’s regulation, deposited in December 2018, made progress towards meeting the policy objective of a 45% decrease in methane emissions by 2025 from a 2014 baseline. We evaluated the performance and cost effectiveness of regulatory-prescribed LDAR programs using data collected by the BC Energy Regulator (formerly BC Oil and Gas Commission) for the 2020 year, and survey cost data submitted by service providers. We found that the new regulation was only partially effective due to low compliance rates. We also observed heavy tail leak distributions in LDAR data collected by service companies, but comparatively narrow leak distributions in data from permit holders who internalized LDAR operations, suggesting a difference in work practice or the use of equipment. Comprehensive leak detection surveys were found to be more cost efficient ($23 CAD/tCO2e reduced) compared to screening surveys ($1,787 CAD/tCO2e reduced) because more methane leaks are detected in comprehensive assessments. To meet methane reduction targets, we recommend that: 1) jurisdictions work to improve compliance rates by introducing minimum administrative penalties specific to noncompliance; 2) that all future LDAR surveys are instrument-based; 3) limiting turnaround time limits so that repairs are not delayed indefinitely; and 4) that LDAR completed internally by permit holders undergo independent third-party verification.

Description

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Climate Policy on June 20, 2023, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2229295.

Subject

  • Gas industry,
  • Regulations,
  • Atmospheric emissions,
  • Pollution prevention

Rights

Pagination

42 pages

Peer review

Yes

Identifiers

ISSN
1469-3062
1752-7457

Article

Journal title
Climate Policy
Journal volume
23
Journal issue
10
Accepted date
2023-06-20
Submitted date
2022-09-19

Download(s)

URI

Collection(s)

Air

Full item page

Full item page

Page details

Date modified: