Performance of rapid antigen tests in identifying Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 infections in South Africa

Thumbnail image

Download files

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105498

Language of the publication
English
Date
2023-08
Type
Article
Author(s)
  • Samsunder, Natasha
  • Lustig, Gila
  • de Vos, Margaretha
  • Ngcapu, Sinaye
  • Giandhari, Jennifer
  • Tshiabuila, Derek
  • San, Emmanuel James
  • Lewis, Lara
  • Kharsany, Ayesha B. M.
  • Cawood, Cherie
  • de Oliveira, Tulio
  • Sivro, Aida
  • Abdool Karim, Quarraisha
  • Escadafal, Camille
  • Naidoo, Kogieleum
  • Abdool Karim, Salim
Publisher
Pan American Society for Clinical Virology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns around accuracy and performance of rapid antigen tests continue to be raised with the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of two widely used SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests during BA.4/BA.5 SARS-CoV-2 wave in South Africa (May - June 2022). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective field evaluation compared the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid test from Hangzhou AllTest Biotech (nasal swab) and the Standard Q COVID-19 Rapid Antigen test from SD Biosensor (nasopharyngeal swab) to the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay (nasopharyngeal swab) on samples collected from 540 study participants. RESULTS: Overall 28.52% (154/540) were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive with median cycle number value of 12.30 (IQR 9.30-19.40). Out of the 99 successfully sequenced SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, 18 were classified as BA.4 and 56 were classified as BA.5. The overall sensitivities of the AllTest SARS-CoV-2 Ag test and Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test were 73.38% (95% CI 65.89-79.73) and 74.03% (95% CI 66.58-80.31) and their specificities were 97.41% (95% CI 95.30-98.59) and 99.22% (95% CI 97.74-99.74) respectively. Sensitivity was >90% when the cycle number value was 90% in samples infected with Omicron sub-lineage BA.4 and BA.5. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of tested rapid antigen tests that target the nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 protein, were not adversely affected by BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron sub-variants."

Subject

  • Health

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2,
  • COVID-19,
  • Antigen,
  • Sensitivity,
  • Specificity,
  • Omicron,
  • BA.4,
  • BA.5

Rights

Peer review

Yes

Identifiers

PubMed ID
37329842
ISSN
1386-6532
Other
PMC10236920

Article

Journal title
Journal of clinical virology
Journal volume
165
Article number
105498

Citation(s)

Samsunder, N., Lustig, G., de Vos, M., Ngcapu, S., Giandhari, J., Tshiabuila, D., San, E. J., Lewis, L., Kharsany, A. B., Cawood, C., de Oliveira, T., Abdool Karim, Q., Abdool Karim, S., Escadafal, C., Naidoo, K., & Sivro, A. (2023). Performance of rapid antigen tests in identifying Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 infections in South Africa. Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 165, 105498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105498

Download(s)

URI

Collection(s)

Public health surveillance

Full item page

Full item page

Page details

Date modified: