Performance of rapid antigen tests in identifying Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 infections in South Africa

Simple item page

Simple item page

Full item details

creativework.keywords - en
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
Antigen
Sensitivity
Specificity
Omicron
BA.4
BA.5
dc.contributor.author
Samsunder, Natasha
Lustig, Gila
de Vos, Margaretha
Ngcapu, Sinaye
Giandhari, Jennifer
Tshiabuila, Derek
San, Emmanuel James
Lewis, Lara
Kharsany, Ayesha B. M.
Cawood, Cherie
de Oliveira, Tulio
Sivro, Aida
Abdool Karim, Quarraisha
Escadafal, Camille
Naidoo, Kogieleum
Abdool Karim, Salim
dc.date.accessioned
2023-09-29T16:28:01Z
dc.date.available
2023-09-29T16:28:01Z
dc.date.issued
2023-08
dc.description.abstract - en
BACKGROUND: Concerns around accuracy and performance of rapid antigen tests continue to be raised with the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of two widely used SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests during BA.4/BA.5 SARS-CoV-2 wave in South Africa (May - June 2022). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective field evaluation compared the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid test from Hangzhou AllTest Biotech (nasal swab) and the Standard Q COVID-19 Rapid Antigen test from SD Biosensor (nasopharyngeal swab) to the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay (nasopharyngeal swab) on samples collected from 540 study participants. RESULTS: Overall 28.52% (154/540) were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive with median cycle number value of 12.30 (IQR 9.30-19.40). Out of the 99 successfully sequenced SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, 18 were classified as BA.4 and 56 were classified as BA.5. The overall sensitivities of the AllTest SARS-CoV-2 Ag test and Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test were 73.38% (95% CI 65.89-79.73) and 74.03% (95% CI 66.58-80.31) and their specificities were 97.41% (95% CI 95.30-98.59) and 99.22% (95% CI 97.74-99.74) respectively. Sensitivity was >90% when the cycle number value was 90% in samples infected with Omicron sub-lineage BA.4 and BA.5. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of tested rapid antigen tests that target the nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 protein, were not adversely affected by BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron sub-variants."
dc.identifier.citation
Samsunder, N., Lustig, G., de Vos, M., Ngcapu, S., Giandhari, J., Tshiabuila, D., San, E. J., Lewis, L., Kharsany, A. B., Cawood, C., de Oliveira, T., Abdool Karim, Q., Abdool Karim, S., Escadafal, C., Naidoo, K., & Sivro, A. (2023). Performance of rapid antigen tests in identifying Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 infections in South Africa. Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 165, 105498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105498
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105498
dc.identifier.issn
1386-6532
dc.identifier.other
PMC10236920
dc.identifier.pubmedID
37329842
dc.identifier.uri
https://open-science.canada.ca/handle/123456789/1183
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
dc.rights - en
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights - fr
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.uri - en
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.uri - fr
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subject - en
Health
dc.subject - fr
Santé
dc.subject.en - en
Health
dc.subject.fr - fr
Santé
dc.title - en
Performance of rapid antigen tests in identifying Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 infections in South Africa
dc.type - en
Article
dc.type - fr
Article
local.acceptedmanuscript.articlenum
105498
local.article.journaltitle
Journal of clinical virology
local.article.journalvolume
165
local.peerreview - en
Yes
local.peerreview - fr
Oui
Download(s)

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Thumbnail image

Name: samsunder-rapid-antigen-testing-omicron-ba4-ba5-south-africa.pdf

Size: 370.21 KB

Format: PDF

Download file

Page details

Date modified: