Evaluation of surface conditions from operational forecasts using in situ saildrone observations in the Pacific Arctic

Thumbnail image

Download files

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0379.1

Language of the publication
English
Date
2022-06-17
Type
Article
Author(s)
  • Zhang, Chidong
  • Levine, Aaron F.
  • Wang, Muyin
  • Gentemann, Chelle
  • Mordy, Calvin W.
  • Cokelet, Edward D.
  • Browne, Philip A.
  • Yang, Qiong
  • Lawrence-Slavas, Noah
  • Meinig, Christian
  • Smith, Gregory
  • Chiodi, Andy
  • Zhang, Dongxiao
  • Stabeno, Phyllis
  • Wang, Wanqiu
  • Ren, Hong-Li
  • Peterson, K. Andrew
  • Figueroa, Silvio N.
  • Steele, Michael
  • Barton, Neil P.
  • Huang, Andrew
  • Shin, Hyun-Cheol
Publisher
American Meteorological Society

Abstract

Observations from uncrewed surface vehicles (saildrones) in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas during June–September 2019 were used to evaluate initial conditions and forecasts with lead times up to 10 days produced by eight operational numerical weather prediction centers. Prediction error behaviors in pressure and wind are found to be different from those in temperature and humidity. For example, errors in surface pressure were small in short-range (<6 days) forecasts, but they grew rapidly with increasing lead time beyond 6 days. Non-weighted multimodel means outperformed all individual models approaching a 10-day forecast lead time. In contrast, errors in surface air temperature and relative humidity could be large in initial conditions and remained large through 10-day forecasts without much growth, and non-weighted multimodel means did not outperform all individual models. These results following the tracks of the mobile platforms are consistent with those at a fixed location. Large errors in initial condition of sea surface temperature (SST) resulted in part from the unusual Arctic surface warming in 2019 not captured by data assimilation systems used for model initialization. These errors in SST led to large initial and prediction errors in surface air temperature. Our results suggest that improving predictions of surface conditions over the Arctic Ocean requires enhanced in situ observations and better data assimilation capability for more accurate initial conditions as well as better model physics. Numerical predictions of Arctic atmospheric conditions may continue to suffer from large errors if they do not fully capture the large SST anomalies related to Arctic warming.

Description

Copyright [2022] American Meteorological Society (AMS). For permission to reuse any portion of this Work, please contact permissions@ametsoc.org. Any use of material in this Work that is determined to be “fair use” under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 U.S. Code § 107) or that satisfies the conditions specified in Section 108 of the U.S. Copyright Act (17 USC § 108) does not require the AMS’s permission. Republication, systematic reproduction, posting in electronic form, such as on a website or in a searchable database, or other uses of this material, except as exempted by the above statement, requires written permission or a license from the AMS. All AMS journals and monograph publications are registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (https://www.copyright.com). Additional details are provided in the AMS Copyright Policy statement, available on the AMS website (https://www.ametsoc.org/PUBSCopyrightPolicy)

Subject

  • Nature and environment,
  • Science and technology

Pagination

1437-1455

Peer review

Yes

Open access level

Green

Identifiers

ISSN
0027-0644
1520-0493

Article

Journal title
Monthly Weather Review
Journal volume
150
Journal issue
6
Accepted date
2022-02-17
Submitted date
2020-11-17

Download(s)

URI

Collection(s)

Climate and weather

Full item page

Full item page

Page details

Date modified: